Yes, I am talking about the most brutal rape which took place in the capital city of India Delhi. The youngest of all involved in December 16, 2012 rape and murder named Bhura is said to be a juvenile, well many doubt of his being a juvenile not because if he can think and incite people around him to rape an innocent girl but also because there is no hard proof that he is below the age of 18. Only the health reports say so but the question of law is that a child who can rape a girl can he be considered juvenile? Well I think no, because rape is something which a child can't even imagine but the one who committed such a thing how can he be considered a child? Another thing which leaves a person in shock is the history of this guy. A person who left his village in search of work at a very small age and his co-workers say that he was not at all a bad person, a person who was not at all into girls but did bad company made him so? May be yes because till the time he was among good people he was a person who was much interested in his work rather than what was happening around him. His mother says that he should be forgiven ones because the family needs him. He has a family of seven - mother, father who is a psychiatric patient, two girls in their early teens and three young boys. Another question that comes up to my mind is that the court or the parent's of the girl should forgive this person so that one fine day he rapes another innocent girl?
Well according to me he should be either hanged or he should be sentenced to rigorous life imprisonment.
" A dog which can bite innocent people should not be left on the streets open he should be either hanged or he should be killed for the benefit of the society".
No comments:
Post a Comment